Belasco describes two different fixes for our dilemma: the technological fix and the anthropological fix. The technological fix predicts that through engineering and research, we will continue to increase efficiency and production output to keep feeding the ever increasing population. Such things as genetic engineering and nanotechnology will likely play a major role in this fix. The anthropological fix goes in the complete opposite direction and redesigns people's values, not their technologies. It would mean the reverse of industrialization and moving back to relying on local farming and seasonal eating. Belasco notes that both fixes are extreme scenarios and the future will probably entail a mix of the two fixes.
Questions:
Is an anthropological fix even viable considering human nature, our desire to move forward, and our love of new technologies?
Who is to blame for all of these problems we face now?
How much longer do we have until these problems start to significantly affect our lives and we have to drastically change the way we live?
I think Belasco's quote "We didn't inherit the land from our fathers; we are borrowing it from our children" is the perfect answer to your second question. People are too caught up in the present and many times too selfish to think of the consequences their actions will cause. It is true that both our generation and those before us have caused this dilemma, but our future lies in the hands this generation and it is our responsibility to educate the next.
ReplyDeleteMr Pedro is absolutely incredible. He’s been so responsive, so patient & honest, and just wonderful at his job as a loan officer. I will buy every future house with him if I ever move to DC. He’s just the absolute best.”
ReplyDeleteI will recommend anyone here looking for a loan to contact a loan officer Pedro on Email... pedroloanss@gmail.com